Updated 14/5-2012
To those that are more interested in learning the whipback instead of this lengthy debate about whatever… then you can read a couple of beginner articles how to start learning to do whipbacks:
All of these articles focus on getting your feet in front of you (1st step to learning to do a whip back … well also if you are learning to do a back handspring).
Updated 14/5-2012
lol,.. I can see Daniel (Mr. Bay Netgymnast) has linked to my site via. a untrusted proxy server called “hidemyass”.. this kind of proxy server is used by most part by people that want to be hidden because they are doing unlawful things. I would not recommend using that link, because you can risk being flagged (which means you are now a better candidate for “big brother”… and no “big brother” is not the reality TV show).
Anyways,.. since Daniel wants to explode the conversation and try to force it into a debate war, I guess I should go into more details about the whipback and why it should be long.
The material gymnasts are using today is fantastic,.. they can use fasttracks, airtracks, rod floors and so on… Long time ago gymnasts actually jumped on semi-hard floors. To do skills like a whipback (or back handspring) on a semi-hard floor you had to jump more upwards then backwards, because the semi-hard floors absorb most of the energy. Today the floors are really good at giving this energy back (rebound) to the gymnasts and this of course also means that the technique for doing certain skills has to change.
The whipback has one main purpose and that is to increase speed (gain more power). If the gymnasts do short whipbacks they will loose a lot this power, because they will have to put their body into a position that is not straight. The long the whipback the more straight the body position will be and will be able to utilize the track much better.
Straight you say?!?! Yes straight,.. the goal for all gymnasts is to be as straight as possible when doing whipbacks or back handsprings, but physically this is impossible, but it is something they should be aiming for. The more straight they are will also result with the whipbacks (and back handsprings) being longer. In the real world their will always be a slight arch, but the gymnast should try to reduce this arch.
Daniel works with short whipbacks, big arches and pike landings… all which are completely wrong in my book. I teach at the Odense Idrætspark Gymnastikhal after Daniel and I have a front bench view and can see the results on his gymnasts (I become so sad when I see gymnasts building bad routines up for the rest of their life).
You might being asking your self,.. Daniel has some really good gymnasts on his team like Adam. Yes,. Adam is really good and their are others on Daniels team that are really good…. but if you look at the percentage of how many of his gymnasts become that good you will quickly see that it’s like 1% – 2% and all other gymnasts seem to fade out after time. A talented gymnast will for the most part always move forward regardless of what is being taught. Do not confuse the word “talented gymnast” to everybody.. very few gymnasts are born talented.
Peter
Original Content Below 13/5-2012
A gymnast with the user name “Janus-mols” at netgymnast.net has asked people to look at his whipback and come with comments.
This is one of the few videos I have really have a big respect for, and wish more people would post videos like that instead samplers with gymnasts doing skills they can only do in a pit. See the video and posts here.
I decided to comment on it, because one of the mistakes was that he isn’t getting enough length on his whipback. The angle the whips was taken at makes it hard to see his body position, so I didn’t comment on that until he began to twist where you could clearly see he isn’t keeping the layout position.
Anyways.. the funny part is that more people started to comment on the video (which is great)… but then one of the National Team Coach helper (Daniel) decided to comment on it too and this is were I decided not to continue posting on that thread. What shocks me is what that coach had to say… he basically says that the length of the whipback isn’t important… omg!
I’m surprised that Daniel is a helper on the National Team when he doesn’t even seem to know or understand the basics why a whipback and back handsprings should have length. This also makes me wonder if Michael Jensen the national coach even understands this?! (I once received an email from Michael were he stated the back handspring should have a length that is appropriate to what they are doing,.. this was a good diplomatic answer because it can mean the back handspring should be long …. but it also can mean it should be short depending on what they are trying to achieve…. this was a fair comment and acceptable)
I’m not going to post at NetGymnast because most people their act like they are in kindergarten and can be very difficult to have a serious debate on this kind of subject.
but one thing I’m 100% sure is that the whipbacks and back handsprings must have length!
Peter